{"id":8860,"date":"2024-11-30T17:40:30","date_gmt":"2024-11-30T17:40:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/?p=8860"},"modified":"2024-11-30T17:40:41","modified_gmt":"2024-11-30T17:40:41","slug":"lirimi-me-kusht","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/lirimi-me-kusht\/","title":{"rendered":"Lirimi me Kusht"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h5 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>DISA PROBLEMATIKA T\u00cb INSTITUTIT T\u00cb LIRIMIT ME KUSHT P\u00cbR T\u00cb D\u00cbNUARIT ME BURGIM T\u00cb P\u00cbRJETSH\u00cbM, P\u00cbRBALL\u00cb STANDARDIT T\u00cb KONVENT\u00cbS EUROPIANE P\u00cbR T\u00cb DREJTAT E NJERIUT DISA PROBLEMATIKA T\u00cb INSTITUTIT T\u00cb LIRIMIT ME KUSHT P\u00cbR T\u00cb D\u00cbNUARIT ME BURGIM T\u00cb P\u00cbRJETSH\u00cbM, P\u00cbRBALL\u00cb STANDARDIT T\u00cb KONVENT\u00cbS EUROPIANE P\u00cbR T\u00cb DREJTAT E NJERIUT<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Koncepti dhe q\u00ebllimi i institutit t\u00eb lirimit me kusht<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>N\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet institutit t\u00eb lirimit me kusht personi, q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb duke vuajtur d\u00ebnimin me burg, lirohet para se ta ket\u00eb mbaruar plot\u00ebsisht at\u00eb, me kusht q\u00eb derisa t\u00eb p\u00ebrfundoj\u00eb koha p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn \u00ebsht\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb d\u00ebnimi, t\u00eb mos kryej\u00eb vep\u00ebr tjet\u00ebr penale. P\u00ebrfitimi i personit t\u00eb d\u00ebnuar ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me faktin se nuk do t\u00eb vuaj\u00eb pjes\u00ebn e mbetur t\u00eb d\u00ebnimit.<sup>[<a href=\"#_ftn1\" id=\"_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a>]<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ky instrument i t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs penale duhet par\u00eb n\u00eb funksion t\u00eb riedukimit t\u00eb personave q\u00eb vuajn\u00eb d\u00ebnimin me burg, parandalimin e recidivizmit dhe nj\u00ebkoh\u00ebsisht si nj\u00eb mjet n\u00eb luft\u00ebn kund\u00ebr kriminalitetit.<sup>[<a href=\"#_ftn2\" id=\"_ftnref2\">[2]<\/a>]<\/sup> Lirimi me kusht shpreh karakterin human dhe proporcionalitetin e nd\u00ebshkimit n\u00eb legjislacionin penal. Sipas p\u00ebrkufizimit q\u00eb b\u00ebn doktrina, dh\u00ebnia e liris\u00eb para kohe me kusht, pa vuajtur plot\u00ebsisht d\u00ebnimin e dh\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb vendimin penal, p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebson nj\u00eb shp\u00ebrblim q\u00eb i jepet t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarit i cili gjat\u00eb periudh\u00ebs s\u00eb vuajtjes s\u00eb d\u00ebnimit ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb prova t\u00eb vazhdueshme t\u00eb sjelljes s\u00eb mir\u00eb.<sup>[<a href=\"#_ftn3\" id=\"_ftnref3\">[3]<\/a>][<a href=\"#_ftn4\" id=\"_ftnref4\">[4]<\/a>]<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Jurisprudenca \u00ebsht\u00eb shprehur se ratio e k\u00ebtij instituti, \u00ebsht\u00eb e dyfisht\u00eb ku nga nj\u00ebra an\u00eb duhet t\u00eb shp\u00ebrblej\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarin i cili ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb prova t\u00eb rehabilitimit, dhe kjo p\u00ebrb\u00ebn q\u00ebllimin e posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb norm\u00ebs dhe nga ana tjet\u00ebr t\u00eb sh\u00ebrbej\u00eb si shembull p\u00ebr t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarit e tjer\u00eb.<sup>[<a href=\"#_ftn5\" id=\"_ftnref5\">[5]<\/a>] <\/sup>Sipas jurisprudenc\u00ebs italiane themeli i k\u00ebtij instituti ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me mund\u00ebsin\u00eb e rehabilitimit t\u00eb brendsh\u00ebm t\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarit me kalimin e koh\u00ebs, dhe n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet k\u00ebsaj t\u00eb b\u00ebrit t\u00eb mundur e relativizmit t\u00eb rrezikshm\u00ebris\u00eb shoq\u00ebrore t\u00eb tij.<sup>[<a href=\"#_ftn6\" id=\"_ftnref6\">[6]<\/a>]<\/sup> Pik\u00ebrisht, b\u00ebrja me dije personave t\u00eb d\u00ebnuar se n\u00ebse shfaqin sjellje pozitive mund t\u00eb lirohen nga vuajtja e d\u00ebnimit me burg edhe para se ta kryejn\u00eb n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsi d\u00ebnimin, sh\u00ebrben si nxitje dhe stimulim q\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarit t\u00eb jen\u00eb m\u00eb aktiv\u00eb n\u00eb trajtimin e risocializimit t\u00eb tyre jo vet\u00ebm n\u00eb institucionin e vuajtjes s\u00eb d\u00ebnimit por edhe jasht\u00eb tij, n\u00eb liri.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Si p\u00ebrfundim, ky instrument nuk duhet ngat\u00ebruar me d\u00ebnimin apo faljen e d\u00ebnimit, por ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me nj\u00eb alternativ\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebnimit q\u00eb jepet n\u00eb faz\u00ebn e ekzekutimit t\u00eb procedimit penal kur i d\u00ebnuari ka vuajtur pjes\u00ebn thelb\u00ebsore t\u00eb d\u00ebnimit me burgim (dhe t\u00eb p\u00ebrjetsh\u00ebm), dhe vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr arsye t\u00eb ve\u00e7anta, n\u00ebse me sjelljen dhe pun\u00ebn e tij tregon se me d\u00ebnimin e vuajtur \u00ebsht\u00eb arritur q\u00ebllimi p\u00ebr edukimin e tij.<sup>[<a href=\"#_ftn7\" id=\"_ftnref7\">[7]<\/a>]<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 1.1. Kuptimi i lirimit me kusht p\u00ebr t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarit me burgim t\u00eb p\u00ebrjetsh\u00ebm<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Lirimi me kusht \u00ebsht\u00eb parashikuar si institut i posa\u00e7\u00ebm n\u00eb Kodin Penal n\u00eb nenet 64 dhe 65. Neni 64 rregullon institutin n\u00eb p\u00ebrgjith\u00ebsi, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb neni 65 b\u00ebn nj\u00eb rregullim specifik, p\u00ebr lirimin me kusht p\u00ebr t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarit me burgim t\u00eb p\u00ebrjetsh\u00ebm.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Referuar formulimit t\u00eb dispozit\u00ebs, neni 65 i Kodit Penal e konsideron lirimin me kusht p\u00ebr t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarit me burgim t\u00eb p\u00ebrjetsh\u00ebm si nj\u00eb p\u00ebrjashtim, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb rregulli \u00ebsht\u00eb se ata nuk do ta ken\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb benefit. Nga ana tjet\u00ebr, dispozita parashikon se vet\u00ebm n\u00eb raste t\u00eb jashtzakonshme, do t\u00eb lejohet lirimi me kusht dhe vet\u00ebm n\u00ebse: i. kryen jo m\u00eb pak se 35 vjet burg; ii. ka mbajtur sjellje shembullore; dhe iii. \u00ebsht\u00eb arritur q\u00ebllimi i d\u00ebnimit p\u00ebr edukimin e tij. Sipas parashikimit m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb e kritereve jan\u00eb t\u00eb natyr\u00ebs objektive dhe pjesa tjet\u00ebr jan\u00eb subjektive\/materiale dhe t\u00eb vler\u00ebsueshme n\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb provave t\u00eb sjella nga k\u00ebrkuesi dhe organe t\u00eb tjera administrative. Kriter objektiv \u00ebsht\u00eb koha (35 vjet) q\u00eb k\u00ebrkuesi duhet t\u00eb ket\u00eb vuajtur para s\u00eb cil\u00ebs mund t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb lirim me kusht dhe nga ana tjet\u00ebr, kritere materiale mbeten vler\u00ebsimi i sjelljes s\u00eb tij dhe vler\u00ebsimi i arritjes s\u00eb q\u00ebllimit t\u00eb d\u00ebnimit n\u00eb funksion t\u00eb edukimit t\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pavar\u00ebsisht kushteve q\u00eb parashikon paragrafi i dyt\u00eb, n\u00eb paragrafin e tret\u00eb ndalohet kategorikisht lirimi me kusht p\u00ebr t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarit p\u00ebr veprat penale t\u00eb &#8220;vrasjes p\u00ebr gjakmarrje&#8221; (Neni 78\/a), &#8220;vrasjes s\u00eb funksionar\u00ebve publik&#8221; (Neni 79\/a), &#8220;vrasjes s\u00eb funksionareve t\u00eb Policis\u00eb s\u00eb Shtetit&#8221; (Neni 79\/b), &#8220;vrasjes p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies familjare&#8221; (Neni 79\/c) dhe &#8220;marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieve seksuale apo homoseksuale me dhun\u00eb me t\u00eb mitur&#8221; (Neni 100\/3).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Disa problematika t\u00eb norm\u00ebs n\u00eb k\u00ebndv\u00ebshtrim t\u00eb jurisprudenc\u00ebs s\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Evropiane p\u00ebr t\u00eb Drejtat e Njeriut (GjEDNj)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Referuar struktur\u00ebs s\u00eb dispozit\u00ebs, vler\u00ebsojm\u00eb se ngrihen disa \u00e7\u00ebshtje q\u00eb meritojn\u00eb v\u00ebmendje dhe q\u00eb kan\u00eb t\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb me faktin n\u00ebse: i. neni 65 mund\u00ebson lirimin me kusht p\u00ebr t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarit me burgim t\u00eb p\u00ebrjetsh\u00ebm <em>de iure<\/em> dhe <em>de facto<\/em>; ii. afati prej 35 vjet\u00ebsh \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me standardet nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtare; iii. kuptimi i fjal\u00ebs &#8220;raste t\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonshme&#8221; \u00ebsht\u00eb i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb apo ka dallim me parashikimin &#8220;raste t\u00eb ve\u00e7anta&#8221; t\u00eb b\u00ebra n\u00eb nenin 64 t\u00eb Kodit Penal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <em>&#8211; Lidhur me mund\u00ebsin\u00eb e p\u00ebrfitimit de jure dhe de facto nga mund\u00ebsia e lirimit me kusht<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Jurisprudenca e GjEDNj ka vler\u00ebsuar se dh\u00ebnia e nj\u00eb d\u00ebnimi me burgim t\u00eb p\u00ebrjetsh\u00ebm nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e ndaluar nga Konventa apo dokumente t\u00eb tjera nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtare.<sup>[<a href=\"#_ftn8\" id=\"_ftnref8\">[8]<\/a>] <\/sup>Megjithat\u00eb, p\u00ebr t\u00eb qen\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me nenin 3 t\u00eb KEDNJ-s\u00eb, nj\u00eb d\u00ebnim me burgim t\u00eb p\u00ebrjetsh\u00ebm duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb i reduktuesh\u00ebm <em>de jure<\/em> dhe <em>de facto<\/em>, q\u00eb do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se duhet t\u00eb ket\u00eb nj\u00eb perspektiv\u00eb lirimi p\u00ebr t\u00eb burgosurin.<sup>[<a href=\"#_ftn9\" id=\"_ftnref9\">[9]<\/a>] <\/sup>Referuar parashikimit t\u00eb nenit 65 t\u00eb Kodit Penal, duket se n\u00eb disa momente dispozita bllokon kategorikisht mund\u00ebsin\u00eb e p\u00ebrfitimit nga e drejta. Kjo s\u00eb pari n\u00eb formulimin e paragrafit t\u00eb par\u00eb ku shprehet se lirimi me kusht nuk lejohet p\u00ebr t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarit me burgim t\u00eb p\u00ebrjetsh\u00ebm. Po ashtu edhe paragrafi i tret\u00eb ndalon kategorikisht mund\u00ebsin\u00eb e lirimit me kusht p\u00ebr t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarit p\u00ebr vepra penale t\u00eb parashikuara nga nenet 78\/a, 79\/a, 79\/b, 79\/c dhe 100 (3) t\u00eb Kodit Penal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Duket se kjo praktik\u00eb bie ndesh me lirit\u00eb dhe t\u00eb drejtat themelore t\u00eb njeriut dhe konkretisht me ndalimin e tortur\u00ebs dhe trajtimit \u00e7njer\u00ebzor. N\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen <em>Kajkaris <\/em>GjEDNj sanksionoi p\u00ebr her\u00eb t\u00eb par\u00eb standardin e ndalimit t\u00eb aplikimit t\u00eb d\u00ebnimit me burgim t\u00eb p\u00ebrjetsh\u00ebm pa mund\u00ebsin\u00eb e lirimit me kusht. Ky instrument nuk ndalon n\u00eb vet\u00ebvete q\u00eb t\u00eb aplikohet d\u00ebnimi me burgim t\u00eb p\u00ebretsh\u00ebm, por ai duhet t\u00eb analizohet rast pas rasti dhe mbi baz\u00ebn e vler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb personalitetit t\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarit.<sup>[<a href=\"#_ftn10\" id=\"_ftnref10\">[10]<\/a>]<\/sup> Th\u00ebn\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb, duksh\u00ebm dispozita imponon nj\u00eb standard t\u00eb ngurt\u00eb dhe heq me ligj, mund\u00ebsin\u00eb e lirimit me kusht p\u00ebr nj\u00eb kategori t\u00eb caktuar t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarish. Shteti ka detyr\u00eb t\u00eb burgos\u00eb me q\u00ebllim mbrojtjen e marrdh\u00ebnieve juridike n\u00eb shoq\u00ebri, por nga ana tjet\u00ebr, ka edhe p\u00ebr detyr\u00eb t\u00eb kujdeset p\u00ebr riintegrimin e njer\u00ebzve n\u00eb shoq\u00ebri. Ndalimi kategorik q\u00eb b\u00ebhet n\u00eb nenin 65, duket se niset nga nj\u00eb premis\u00eb e gabuar (dhe potencialisht diskriminuese) <sup>[<a href=\"#_ftn11\" id=\"_ftnref11\">[11]<\/a>]<\/sup> se nj\u00eb kategori e caktuar t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarisht, nuk mund t\u00eb riintegrohen. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb vler\u00ebsojm\u00eb se k\u00ebto parashikime vijn\u00eb n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me standardin e GjEDNj.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &#8211; Lidhur me plot\u00ebsimin e afatit prej 35 vjet\u00ebsh p\u00ebr paraqitjen e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs p\u00ebr lirim me kusht<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>GjEDNj \u00ebsht\u00eb shprehur se nuk nd\u00ebrhyn n\u00eb mas\u00ebn e d\u00ebnimeve t\u00eb parashikuara nga vendet an\u00ebtare, pasi kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb rezerv\u00eb e juridiksionit t\u00eb \u00e7do vendi.<sup>[<a href=\"#_ftn12\" id=\"_ftnref12\">[12]<\/a>]<\/sup> Megjithat\u00eb, n\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen <em>Vinter k. Mbret\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb Bashkuar<\/em>, Gjykata duke referuar n\u00eb dokumenta nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtare si Statuti i Rom\u00ebs dhe duke b\u00ebr\u00eb nj\u00eb studim krahasues n\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha vendet e K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Evrop\u00ebs (KE), \u00ebsht\u00eb shprehur se legjislacioni i brendsh\u00ebm duhet t\u00eb parashikoj\u00eb nj\u00eb mund\u00ebsi t\u00eb lirimit me kusht p\u00ebr t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarit me burgim t\u00eb p\u00ebrjetsh\u00ebm, kur vler\u00ebsohet se \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrmbushur q\u00ebllimi i d\u00ebnimit dhe vazhdimi i vuajtjes s\u00eb d\u00ebnimit nuk justifikohet mbi baza penalogjike. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb, GjEDNj sugjeron q\u00eb koha pas s\u00eb cil\u00ebs mund t\u00eb lejohet paraqitja e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs p\u00ebr lirim me kusht p\u00ebr t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarit me burgim t\u00eb p\u00ebrjetsh\u00ebm, t\u00eb jet\u00eb jo m\u00eb shum\u00eb se nga vuajtja e 25 viteve burgim.<sup>[<a href=\"#_ftn13\" id=\"_ftnref13\">[13]<\/a>]<\/sup> N\u00eb po k\u00ebt\u00eb k\u00ebndv\u00ebshtrim GjEDNj \u00ebsht\u00eb shprehur se edhe nj\u00eb afat prej 40 vjet\u00ebsh \u00ebsht\u00eb duksh\u00ebm n\u00eb shkelje t\u00eb parashikimeve t\u00eb Konvent\u00ebs. Mosparashikimi i nj\u00eb afati \u00ebsht\u00eb gjithashtu shkelje.<a href=\"#_ftn14\" id=\"_ftnref14\">[14]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Neni 65 paraqet problematik\u00eb edhe n\u00eb drejtim t\u00eb zgjatjes s\u00eb afatit nga 25 n\u00eb 35 vite, p\u00ebrpara se t\u00eb paraqitet k\u00ebrkesa p\u00ebr lirimin me kusht referuar jurisprudenc\u00ebs cituar m\u00eb sip\u00ebr. Kuptojm\u00eb se ajo \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb me q\u00ebllim t\u00eb harmonizimit me maksimumin e d\u00ebnimit me burg t\u00eb parashikuar n\u00eb nenin 32 t\u00eb Kodit Penal, megjithat\u00eb konstatojm\u00eb se ky afat bie ndesh me rekomandimet dhe standardet nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtare. Zgjatja e afateve mund t\u00eb ket\u00eb t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me nj\u00eb ashp\u00ebrsim t\u00eb politik\u00ebs penale t\u00eb nj\u00eb vendi, megjithat\u00eb kjo nuk duhet t\u00eb kaloj\u00eb marzhin e arsyetueshm\u00ebris\u00eb dhe proporcionalitetit t\u00eb d\u00ebnimit penal. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb kuptim, vler\u00ebsojm\u00eb se edhe ky kriter paraqet problematika.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &#8211; Lidhur me qart\u00ebsin\u00eb e norm\u00ebs dhe kuptimin e termit &#8220;raste t\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonshme&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr problematik\u00eb vler\u00ebsojm\u00eb se ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me qart\u00ebsin\u00eb e norm\u00ebs. Neni 64 i Kodit Penal p\u00ebrmend si kusht p\u00ebr lirim &#8220;arsyet e ve\u00e7anta&#8221;, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb neni 65 rendit &#8220;rastet e jasht\u00ebzakonshme&#8221;. T\u00eb dyja parashikimet duket se krijojn\u00eb konfuzion mbi qart\u00ebsin\u00eb e norm\u00ebs. Jurisprudenca e Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb ka tentuar disa her\u00eb ti qaset interpretimit t\u00eb konceptit. N\u00eb q\u00ebndrimin e saj unifikues p\u00ebr interpretimin e nenit 64 t\u00eb Kodit Penal \u00ebsht\u00eb shprehur se &#8220;arsyet e ve\u00e7anta&#8221; nuk duhen n\u00ebnkuptuar si nj\u00eb kusht shtes\u00eb, por si nj\u00eb kusht i vet\u00ebm, i p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00eb nga fakte t\u00eb cilat provojn\u00eb se \u0451sht\u0451 arritur q\u00ebllimi i d\u00ebnimit penal n\u00eb rastin konkret p\u00ebr edukimin e t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarit dhe ai\/ajo \u00ebsht\u00eb i\/e gatsh\u00ebm t\u00eb ri integrohet n\u00eb shoq\u00ebri.<sup>[<a href=\"#_ftn15\" id=\"_ftnref15\">[15]<\/a>]<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb Gjykata e Lart\u00eb ka b\u00ebr\u00eb nj\u00eb interpretim tjet\u00ebr lidhur me kuptimin e termit &#8220;raste t\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonshme&#8221;. Gjyakata e Lart\u00eb shprehet se p\u00ebr t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarin me burgim t\u00eb p\u00ebrjetsh\u00ebm ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi k\u00ebrkon ekzistenc\u00ebn e rasteve t\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonshme t\u00eb cilat n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb ligjit jan\u00eb ato raste t\u00eb rralla dhe q\u00eb \u00e7mohen prej gjykat\u00ebs si jo vet\u00ebm t\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonshme por edhe q\u00eb p\u00ebr r\u00ebnd\u00ebsin\u00eb q\u00eb kan\u00eb p\u00ebrligjin lirimin me kusht t\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarit me burgim t\u00eb p\u00ebrjetsh\u00ebm, n\u00eb rast se ai plot\u00ebson edhe kushtet e tjera q\u00eb k\u00ebrkon dispozita. Gjithsesi, Kolegji \u00e7mon se rastet e jasht\u00ebzakonshme nuk p\u00ebrfshihen tek arsyet e ve\u00e7anta dhe ato duhet t\u00eb analizohen dhe argumentohen prej gjykat\u00ebs q\u00eb vendos n\u00eb lidhje me lirimin me kusht.<sup>[<a href=\"#_ftn16\" id=\"_ftnref16\">[16]<\/a>]<\/sup> N\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet k\u00ebtij vendimi, Gjykata e Lart\u00eb i sheh &#8220;rastet e jasht\u00ebzakonshme&#8221; si kritere shtes\u00eb q\u00eb i mbivendosen kushteve t\u00eb parashikuara n\u00eb nenin 65 (2) t\u00eb KP. Ajo q\u00eb vihet re n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast \u00ebsht\u00eb q\u00eb Kolegji Penal duke u munduar t\u00eb rendis\u00eb disa element\u00eb q\u00eb mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebjn\u00eb &#8220;raste t\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonshme&#8221; duket se ka vendosur indirekt kritere t\u00eb reja q\u00eb nuk parashikohen n\u00eb ligj.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Lidhur me interpretimin e k\u00ebtij koncepti \u00ebsht\u00eb shprehur edhe doktrina juridike. Parashikimi i lirimit me kusht p\u00ebr t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarit me burgim t\u00eb p\u00ebrjetsh\u00ebm, ka qen\u00eb pjes\u00eb e legjislacionit penal edhe para ndryshimeve demokratike n\u00eb vitet \u201990. Doktrina e koh\u00ebs, ka mbajtur q\u00ebndrimin se &#8220;t\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonshme&#8221; jan\u00eb ato raste, kur nga sjellja shembullore, q\u00ebndrimi vet\u00ebmohues n\u00eb pun\u00eb dhe shoq\u00ebri, veprimet pozitive dhe meritat jo t\u00eb zakonshme t\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarit, b\u00ebhet i qart\u00eb riaft\u00ebsimi i tij moral. <sup>[<a href=\"#_ftn17\" id=\"_ftnref17\">[17]<\/a>]<\/sup> Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb sipas qasjes moderne termi &#8220;raste t\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonshme&#8221; duhet interpretuar brenda kritereve objektive dhe subjektive q\u00eb ligji ka parashikuar shprehimisht. Ajo q\u00eb ligji ka synuar t\u00eb shquaj\u00eb me mbiemrin t\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonsh\u00ebm, \u00ebsht\u00eb fakti q\u00eb bindja e gjykat\u00ebs p\u00ebr rehabilitimin dhe risocializimin e t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarve me burgim t\u00eb p\u00ebrjetsh\u00ebm duhet t\u00eb form\u00ebsohet n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet rrethanave t\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonshme q\u00eb provojn\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00ebsin\u00eb e pretendimeve t\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarit dhe riaft\u00ebsimin e tij p\u00ebr t\u2019u risocializuar. <sup>[<a href=\"#_ftn18\" id=\"_ftnref18\">[18]<\/a>]<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>N\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin ton\u00eb, q\u00ebndrimi q\u00eb ka mbajtur doktrina e t\u00eb dyja periudhave \u00ebsht\u00eb me bind\u00ebs se sa jurisprudenca e fundit e Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb dhe shkon n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebt\u00ebn linj\u00eb me standardin e aplikuar nga GjEDNj. Norma n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn se si \u00ebsht\u00eb formuluar por edhe jurisprudenca e Gjykata\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb vjen n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me jurisprudenc\u00ebn e GjEDNj e cila ka mbajtur q\u00ebndrimin se vler\u00ebsimi i &#8220;rrethanave t\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonshme&#8221;, por pa u specifikuar nga ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi se cilat mund t\u00eb jen\u00eb k\u00ebto rrethana, \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me nenin 3 t\u00eb KEDNJ. <sup>[<a href=\"#_ftn19\" id=\"_ftnref19\">[19]<\/a>]<\/sup> Kjo edhe p\u00ebr faktin se i ndihmon siguris\u00eb juridike. I d\u00ebnuari n\u00eb koh\u00ebn e nisjes s\u00eb vuajtjes s\u00eb d\u00ebnimit duhet t\u00eb ket\u00eb t\u00eb qart\u00eb se cilat do t\u00eb jen\u00eb kushtet q\u00eb ai duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbush\u00eb me q\u00ebllim q\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrfitoj\u00eb nga e drejta e lirimit me kusht. <sup>[<a href=\"#_ftn20\" id=\"_ftnref20\">[20]<\/a>]<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>P\u00ebrfundime<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, nisur edhe nga analiza krahasuese q\u00eb b\u00ebm\u00eb m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, vler\u00ebsojm\u00eb t\u00eb evidentojm\u00eb disa problematika q\u00eb burojn\u00eb nga norma n\u00eb vet\u00ebvete dhe nga aplikimi i saj. Konkretisht vler\u00ebsohet se:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>nevojitet nd\u00ebrhyrje n\u00eb KP p\u00ebr t\u00eb ndryshuar parashikimin mbi ndalimin e lirimit me kusht p\u00ebr t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarit me burgim t\u00eb p\u00ebrjetsh\u00ebm;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>duhet p\u00ebrqasur standardi me vendet e KE lidhur me koh\u00ebn minimale pas s\u00eb cil\u00ebs lind e drejta p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar lirimin me kusht;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>duhen evituar parashikimet diskriminuese n\u00eb legjislacion mbi pamund\u00ebsin\u00eb e nj\u00eb kategorie t\u00eb d\u00ebnuarish p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar lirimin me kusht;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb qart\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb norm\u00ebs duhet t\u00eb ken\u00eb nj\u00eb v\u00ebmendje m\u00eb t\u00eb shtuar nga Gjykata e Lart\u00eb dhe n\u00ebse do t\u00eb jet\u00eb e nevojshme duhet t\u00eb b\u00ebhen edhe q\u00ebndrime nj\u00ebsuese apo unifikuese q\u00eb vijn\u00eb n\u00eb frym\u00ebn e jurisprudenc\u00ebs s\u00eb GjEDNj.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>BIBIOGRAFIA<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Libra dhe artikuj shkencor\u00eb<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>&#8220;Komentar i Kodit Penal t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs&#8221;, Prof. Dr. Ismet Salihu, Mr.Sc. Hilmi Zhitija, Dr.Sc. Fejzullah Hasani, Botimi 1, Tiran\u00eb 2014;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>&#8220;Komentar i Kodit Penal t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb&#8221;, Prof. Dr. Ismet Elezi, Prof. Dr. Ka\u00e7upi, Prof. Dr. Maksim Haxhia, Tiran\u00eb 2009;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>&#8220;E Drejta Penale (Pjesa e P\u00ebrgjithshme)&#8221;, Shefqet Mu\u00e7i, Tiran\u00eb 2012;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>&#8220;E Drejta Penale&#8221; (Pjesa e P\u00ebrgjithshme), Prof. Asoc. Dr. Dorina Hoxha, Prof. Dr. Ka\u00e7upi, Prof. Dr. Maksim Haxhia, Sht\u00ebpia Botuese &#8220;Jozef&#8221;, Tiran\u00eb 2019;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u201cE Drejta penale e Republik\u00ebs Popullore Socialiste t\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb\u201d, A. \u00c7ela, N. Peza, I. Elezi, G. Gjika Sht\u00ebpia botuese \u201c8 n\u00ebntori\u201d, 1982;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vendime gjyq\u00ebsore t\u00eb juridiksionit t\u00eb brendsh\u00ebm<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Vendimi nr. 185, dat\u00eb 16.12.2022 i Kolegjit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Vendimi unifikues nr. 2\/2015 i Kolegjeve t\u00eb Bashkuara t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Vendimi nr. 163, dat\u00eb 14.06.2022 t\u00eb Kolegjit Penal t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Vendimi nr. 34-2020-50, dat\u00eb 24.01.2020, i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Kruj\u00eb;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Vendimi nr. 72\/2012 i Kolegjit Penal t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Vendimi nr. 13\/2014 i Kolegjit Penal t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vendime t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Evropiane p\u00ebr t\u00eb Drejtat e Njeriut<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Kotalla k. Holand\u00ebs (dec.), 6.5.1978;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Bamher k. Mbret\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb Bashkuar (dec.), 14.12.1988;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Kajkaris k. Qipros [GC], 12.2.2008;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Murray k. Holland\u00ebs [GC], 26.4.2016;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u00caas k. Letonis\u00eb, 10.1.2019;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>T. k. Mbret\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb Bashkuar [DHM], nr. 24724\/94, 16 dhjetor 1999;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>V. k. Mbret\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb Bashkuar [DHM], nr. 24888\/94;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Sa\u00eboniuk k. Mbret\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb Bashkuar, nr. 63716\/00.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Vinter k. Mbret\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb Bashkuar [GC], nr. 66069\/09.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>T.P dhe A.T k. Hungaris\u00eb nr. 37871\/14;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Harkachiev dhe Tulumov k. Bullgaris\u00eb nr. 15018\/11;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Petukhov k. Ukrain\u00ebs (nr. 2), nr. 41216\/13;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>L\u00e1szl\u00f3 Magyar k. Hungaris\u00eb, nr. 73593\/10.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Vendime t\u00eb gjykatave t\u00eb huaja<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Vendimi 72 BVerfGE 105, viti 1986 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs Federale Gjermane;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Vendimi nr. 343, dat\u00eb 19.03.1991 i Seksionit I Penal t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Supreme t\u00eb Kasacionit t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Italis\u00eb.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" id=\"_ftn1\"><\/a>[[1]] Shiko Prof. Dr. Ismet Salihu, Mr.Sc. Hilmi Zhitija, Dr.Sc. Fejzullah Hasani, &#8220;Komentar i Kodit Penal t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs&#8221;, Botimi 1, Faqe 307, Tiran\u00eb 2014;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref2\" id=\"_ftn2\"><\/a>[[2]] Sipas Prof. Dr. Ismet Elezi, Prof. Dr. Ka\u00e7upi, Prof. Dr. Maksim Haxhia, &#8220;Komentar i Kodit Penal t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb&#8221;, Fq 279, Tiran\u00eb 2009;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref3\" id=\"_ftn3\"><\/a>[[3]] Shiko Shefqet Mu\u00e7i, &#8220;E Drejta Penale (Pjesa e P\u00ebrgjithshme)&#8221;, Fq, 372, Tiran\u00eb 2012;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref4\" id=\"_ftn4\"><\/a>[[4]] Shiko Prof. Asoc. Dr. Dorina Hoxha, Prof. Dr. Ka\u00e7upi, Prof. Dr. Maksim Haxhia &#8220;E Drejta Penale&#8221; (Pjesa e P\u00ebrgjithshme), Fq 693, Sht\u00ebpia Botuese &#8220;Jozef&#8221;, Tiran\u00eb 2019;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref5\" id=\"_ftn5\"><\/a>[[5]] Shiko vendimin nr. 72\/2012 dhe 13\/2014 t\u00eb Kolegjit Penal t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref6\" id=\"_ftn6\"><\/a>[[6]] Shiko vendimin nr. 343, dat\u00eb 19.03.1991 t\u00eb Seksionit I Penal t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Supreme t\u00eb Kasacionit t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Italis\u00eb, https:\/\/\u00eb\u00eb\u00eb.cortedicassazione.it\/corte-di-cassazione\/<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref7\" id=\"_ftn7\"><\/a>[[7]] Shiko vendimin nr. 185, dat\u00eb 16.12.2022 t\u00eb Kolegjit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref8\" id=\"_ftn8\"><\/a>[[8]] Shiko <em>Kotalla k. Holand\u00ebs<\/em> (dec.), 6.5.1978 dhe <em>Bamher k. Mbret\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb Bashkuar<\/em> (dec.), 14.12.1988).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref9\" id=\"_ftn9\"><\/a>[[9]] Shiko <em>Kajkaris k. Qipros<\/em> [GC], 12.2.2008, \u00a7 98 dhe <em>Murray k. Holland\u00ebs<\/em> [GC], 26.4.2016, \u00a7 99).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref10\" id=\"_ftn10\"><\/a>[[10]] Shiko vendimin 72 BVerfGE 105, viti 1986 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs Federale Gjermane.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref11\" id=\"_ftn11\"><\/a>[[11]] Shiko <em>\u00caas k. Letonis\u00eb<\/em>, 10.1.2019, \u00a7\u00a7 89-90.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref12\" id=\"_ftn12\"><\/a>[[12]] Shiko <em>T. k. Mbret\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb Bashkuar<\/em> [DHM], nr. 24724\/94, \u00a7 117, 16 dhjetor 1999; <em>V. k. Mbret\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb Bashkuar<\/em> [DHM], nr. 24888\/94, \u00a7 118, ECHR 1999-IX dhe <em>Sa\u00eboniuk k. Mbret\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb<\/em> <em>Bashkuar<\/em> (vendim), nr. 63716\/00, GJEDNJ 2001-VI.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref13\" id=\"_ftn13\"><\/a>[[13]] Shiko <em>Vinter k. Mbret\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb Bashkuar<\/em> [GC], nr. 66069\/09<em>, <\/em>\u00a7 117 &#8211; 118.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref14\" id=\"_ftn14\"><\/a>[[14]] Shiko <em>T.P dhe A.T k. Hungaris\u00eb<\/em> nr. 37871\/14 dhe <em>Harkachiev dhe Tulumov k. Bullgaris\u00eb<\/em> nr. 15018\/11.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref15\" id=\"_ftn15\"><\/a>[[15]] Shiko vendimin unifikues nr. 2\/2015 t\u00eb Kolegjeve t\u00eb Bashkuara t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref16\" id=\"_ftn16\"><\/a>[[16]] Shiko vendimin nr. 163, dat\u00eb 14.06.2022 t\u00eb Kolegjit Penal t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb \u00a7 84 &#8211; 85 dhe vendimin nr. 34-2020-50, dat\u00eb 24.01.2020, t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Kruj\u00eb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref17\" id=\"_ftn17\"><\/a>[[17]] Shiko A. \u00c7ela, N. Peza, I. Elezi, G. Gjika \u201cE Drejta penale e Republik\u00ebs Popullore Socialiste t\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb\u201d, Sht\u00ebpia botuese \u201c8 n\u00ebntori\u201d, 1982, fq. 77.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref18\" id=\"_ftn18\"><\/a>[[18]] <em>Idem <\/em>10.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref19\" id=\"_ftn19\"><\/a>[[19]] Shiko <em>Petukhov k. Ukrain\u00ebs<\/em> (nr. 2), nr. 41216\/13, \u00a7 173.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref20\" id=\"_ftn20\"><\/a>[[20]] Shiko <em>L\u00e1szl\u00f3 Magyar k. Hungaris\u00eb<\/em>, nr. 73593\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 49-50, 20 maj 2014, dhe <em>T.P dhe A.T k. Hungaris\u00eb<\/em>, nr. 37871\/14 dhe 73986\/14, \u00a7\u00a7 45-50, 4 tetor 2016.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>DISA PROBLEMATIKA T\u00cb INSTITUTIT T\u00cb LIRIMIT ME KUSHT P\u00cbR T\u00cb D\u00cbNUARIT ME BURGIM T\u00cb P\u00cbRJETSH\u00cbM, P\u00cbRBALL\u00cb STANDARDIT T\u00cb KONVENT\u00cbS EUROPIANE P\u00cbR T\u00cb DREJTAT E NJERIUT DISA PROBLEMATIKA T\u00cb INSTITUTIT T\u00cb LIRIMIT ME KUSHT P\u00cbR T\u00cb D\u00cbNUARIT ME BURGIM T\u00cb P\u00cbRJETSH\u00cbM, P\u00cbRBALL\u00cb STANDARDIT T\u00cb KONVENT\u00cbS EUROPIANE P\u00cbR T\u00cb DREJTAT E NJERIUT N\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet institutit t\u00eb lirimit me [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":8861,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8860","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8860","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8860"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8860\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8862,"href":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8860\/revisions\/8862"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8861"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8860"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8860"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8860"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}