{"id":7589,"date":"2022-03-04T09:00:14","date_gmt":"2022-03-04T09:00:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lawcounsel.radiantthemes.com\/\/?p=7589"},"modified":"2022-03-04T18:20:45","modified_gmt":"2022-03-04T18:20:45","slug":"cenimi-i-imazhit-dhe-publikimi-i-paautorizuar-i-fotografive-te-personazheve-vip-sipas-jurisprudences-italiane","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/cenimi-i-imazhit-dhe-publikimi-i-paautorizuar-i-fotografive-te-personazheve-vip-sipas-jurisprudences-italiane\/","title":{"rendered":"C\u00ebnimi i imazhit dhe publikimi i paautorizuar i fotografive t\u00eb personazheve VIP sipas jurisprudenc\u00ebs italiane."},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Nj\u00eb nga temat m\u00eb t\u00eb diskutura aktualisht n\u00eb fush\u00ebn e t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs, kur media ka arritur t\u00eb thyej\u00eb \u00e7do barrier\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb publikuar lajmin \u00ebsht\u00eb ajo mbi c\u00ebnimin e imazhit. Gjithmon\u00eb e m\u00eb shum\u00eb, \u00a0personazhe t\u00eb njohur kudo n\u00eb bot\u00eb ndjehen t\u00eb c\u00ebnuar n\u00eb privat\u00ebsin\u00eb e tyre duke u b\u00ebr\u00eb shpesh her\u00eb subjekte fotosh private q\u00eb qarkullojn\u00eb n\u00ebp\u00ebr revista apo edhe online pa autorizimin e tyre. Ndaj nuk jan\u00eb t\u00eb pakta rastet kur gjykatat gjenden para p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsis\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjykuar n\u00eb lidhje me d\u00ebmin e shkaktuar n\u00eb t\u00eb tilla raste, duke krijuar edhe nj\u00eb jurisprudenc\u00eb t\u00eb vlefshme p\u00ebr \u00e7\u00ebshtje q\u00eb nuk do t\u00eb mungojn\u00eb asnj\u00ebher\u00eb edhe n\u00eb t\u00eb ardhmen, duke par\u00eb interesin e njer\u00ebzve ndaj jet\u00ebs private t\u00eb personazheve VIP, q\u00eb shtyn mediat t\u00eb k\u00ebnaqin kuriozitetin e tyre, duke siguruar p\u00ebr vete shitje dhe p\u00ebrfitime ekonomike.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

D\u00ebmtimi i imazhit \u00ebsht\u00eb ai q\u00eb d\u00ebmton reputacionin dhe identitetin personal t\u00eb nj\u00eb individi, ose kompleksin\u00a0 e atributeve q\u00eb identifikojn\u00eb nj\u00eb subjekt t\u00eb caktuar n\u00eb kontekstin social ose profesional.<\/p>\n

Si rrjedhim sa her\u00eb q\u00eb publikohet imazhi i nj\u00eb personi pa p\u00eblqimin e tij, ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht nj\u00eb personi t\u00eb famsh\u00ebm t\u00eb fush\u00ebs s\u00eb spektaklit, duhet t\u00eb kemi nj\u00eb kompensim t\u00eb d\u00ebmeve pasurore dhe jopasurore. Pasurore sepse nj\u00eb publikim i paautorizuar sjell d\u00ebme me karakter pasuror duke qen\u00eb se fama e k\u00ebtyre personazheve vjen nga nj\u00eb veprimtari me t\u00eb cil\u00ebn lidhet zakoni i shfryt\u00ebzimit me pages\u00eb t\u00eb figur\u00ebs.<\/p>\n

Ky ishte edhe pretendimi i avokat\u00ebve t\u00eb George Clooney n\u00eb rekusin e paraqitur pran\u00eb Kasacionit italian, \u201cn\u00ebse nj\u00eb aktor fitues i Oskarit, i njohur dhe i dashur n\u00eb mbar\u00eb bot\u00ebn, imazhi i t\u00eb cilit vler\u00ebsohet n\u00eb miliona, nuk ka shitur kurr\u00eb imazhe personale, n\u00ebse i publikohen, edhe pse\u00a0 kund\u00ebr p\u00eblqimit t\u00eb tij, duhet t’i atribuohet nj\u00eb vler\u00eb t\u00eb pakt\u00ebn q\u00eb korrespondon me miliona euro p\u00ebr vler\u00ebn e tyre\u201d.<\/strong><\/p>\n

P\u00ebr nj\u00eb analiz\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb detajuar le ti referohemi vendimit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Kasacionit italian n. 17217\/21.<\/p>\n

\u00c7\u00ebshtja n\u00eb fjal\u00eb ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me padin\u00eb e ngritur pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Milanos nga aktori i famsh\u00ebm George Clooney ndaj Grupit Botues Mondadori dhe Alfonso Signorinit n\u00eb cil\u00ebsin\u00eb e drejtorit t\u00eb Revist\u00ebs \u201cChi\u201d me objekt konstatimin e c\u00ebnimit t\u00eb imazhit t\u00eb aktorit t\u00eb fotografuar n\u00eb gusht t\u00eb vitit 2009 n\u00eb q\u00ebndrime intime me partneren e asokohe Elisabetta Canalis n\u00eb parkun e vil\u00ebs s\u00eb tij n\u00eb Komo.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

P\u00ebr shkeljet e konstatuara padit\u00ebsi \u00a0George Clooney k\u00ebrkoi detyrimin e t\u00eb paditurve p\u00ebr pagimin e nj\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi prej 4 milion euro dhe urdh\u00ebrimin p\u00ebr publikimin e vendimit n\u00eb revist\u00ebn \u201cChi\u201d.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Gjykata e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb Milano me vendimin nr. 14065\/2013, pasi konstatoi paligjshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e publikimit t\u00eb fotove t\u00eb aktorit d\u00ebnoi Grupin botues dhe drejtorin e revist\u00ebs me d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimin prej 300.000 eurosh dhe publikimin e vendimit n\u00eb revist\u00ebn periodike brenda tridhjet\u00eb dit\u00ebve nga njoftimi i vendimit me karaktere me dyfishin e madh\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb atyre q\u00eb p\u00ebrdoren zakonisht p\u00ebr artikujt, duke pranuar k\u00ebshtu k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e Clooneyt.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Nd\u00ebrsa Gjykata e Apelit t\u00eb Milanos me vendimin nr. 671\/2016 e pranoi pjes\u00ebrisht vendimin e Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb duke e ulur vler\u00ebn e d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimit kundrejt t\u00eb paditurve n\u00eb shum\u00ebn 40.000 Euro.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Nga nj\u00ebra an\u00eb, n\u00eb lidhje me ankimin e aktorit p\u00ebr imazhet q\u00eb e portretizonin me partneren e tij, Gjykata u shpreh se kishte shkelje t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb privat\u00ebsis\u00eb, pra t\u00eb nenit 8 t\u00eb KEDNJ, nenit 14 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs italiane, nenit 615 bis t\u00eb kodit penal Italian. Nga ana tjet\u00ebr, Gjykata e Apelit e ka cil\u00ebsuar si t\u00eb tepruar p\u00ebrcaktimin sasior t\u00eb d\u00ebmit t\u00eb kryer nga gjykata, duke p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb edhe d\u00ebmin pasuror t\u00eb paprovuar nga padit\u00ebsi. Sipas Gjykat\u00ebs d\u00ebmi pasuror nuk mund t\u00eb konfigurohet n\u00eb momentin, q\u00eb aktori e kishte p\u00ebrjashtuar shprehimisht p\u00eblqimin p\u00ebr publikimin e imazheve t\u00eb jet\u00ebs s\u00eb tij private, duke mohuar n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb \u00e7do mund\u00ebsi t\u00eb shfryt\u00ebzimit ekonomik t\u00eb k\u00ebtyre imazheve.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Nga ana tjet\u00ebr, sipas Gjykat\u00ebs edhe d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi i d\u00ebmit jopasuror, duhej konsideruar i tep\u00ebrt, duke marr\u00eb parasysh faktin se ky d\u00ebm kishte zgjatur vet\u00ebm disa dit\u00eb, dhe shkalla e nd\u00ebrhyrjes nuk kishte qen\u00eb ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht e lart\u00eb, duke qen\u00eb se kemi t\u00eb b\u00ebjm\u00eb me pamje fotografike t\u00eb aktorit teksa ai endej n\u00eb parkun e vil\u00ebs.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

N\u00eb lidhje me vendimin e Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit Milano ka paraqitur rekurs n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Kasacionit t\u00eb Italis\u00eb padit\u00ebsi George Clooney kund\u00ebr t\u00eb paditurve Grupit Botues Mondadori dhe Alfonso Signorinit, duke u bazuar n\u00eb rekurs n\u00eb 2 motive. Motivi i par\u00eb kishte t\u00eb b\u00ebnte me pretendimin se duke iu referuar edhe parimeve t\u00eb shprehura nga kjo Gjykat\u00eb me supozimin se d\u00ebmi material, duhet t\u00eb konsiderohet i n\u00ebnkuptuar n\u00eb vet\u00eb sjelljen dhe p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye nuk ka nevoj\u00eb t\u00eb provohet sa her\u00eb q\u00eb rezulton nga publikimi i paligjsh\u00ebm i imazhit t\u00eb t\u00eb tjer\u00ebve, ndaj gjyqtari i apelit e kishte mohuar gabimisht d\u00ebmin e pretenduar pasuror q\u00eb rezulton nga publikimi i paligjsh\u00ebm i imazheve t\u00eb aktorit me ish partneren me supozimin se nuk kishte prova. Gjithashtu heqja dor\u00eb nga publikimi i fotografive nuk sjell p\u00ebrjashtimin e shfryt\u00ebzimit ekonomik, duke qen\u00eb se ky vullnet, mbetet i kthyesh\u00ebm, dhe p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye “i ndjesh\u00ebm ndaj rimendimit me kalimin e koh\u00ebs”.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim Gjykata e Kasacionit t\u00eb Italis\u00eb me vendimin nr. 17217\/21 ka pranuar ankesat e padit\u00ebsit George Clooney, duke iu referuar edhe disa nga vendimeve t\u00eb saj m\u00eb t\u00eb fundit, dhe duke p\u00ebrcaktuar se nga d\u00ebshira e shprehur p\u00ebr t\u00eb ndaluar publikimin e fotove q\u00eb lidhen me jet\u00ebn private t\u00eb nj\u00eb personi shum\u00eb t\u00eb njohur nuk mund t\u00eb rezultoj\u00eb automatikisht heqja dor\u00eb nga e drejta e imazhit. <\/strong><\/p>\n

Zgjedhja e tyre p\u00ebr t\u00eb mos publikuar fotografi t\u00eb caktuara ose p\u00ebr t\u00eb shfryt\u00ebzuar ekonomikisht t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat e tyre personale nuk u jep pal\u00ebve t\u00eb treta t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr ta p\u00ebrdorur n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb paligjshme k\u00ebt\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00eb, e cila i mbetet pronarit t\u00eb saj legjitim.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ndaj publikimi i fotografive p\u00ebrmes publikimit n\u00eb gazet\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebn shkelje t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb imazhit dhe privat\u00ebsis\u00eb, si rrjedhim jep t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e kompensimit t\u00eb d\u00ebmit pasuror, i cili mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktohet sipas vler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb kujdessh\u00ebm t\u00eb gjyqtarit.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Nj\u00eb nga temat m\u00eb t\u00eb diskutura aktualisht n\u00eb fush\u00ebn e t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs, kur media ka arritur t\u00eb thyej\u00eb \u00e7do barrier\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb publikuar lajmin \u00ebsht\u00eb ajo mbi c\u00ebnimin e imazhit. Gjithmon\u00eb e m\u00eb shum\u00eb<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":8827,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7589","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7589","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7589"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7589\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8828,"href":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7589\/revisions\/8828"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8827"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7589"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7589"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mustafajlawfirm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7589"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}